VISIONS OF AMERICA: BRITISH WRTERS REFLECT
America,
the colony their countrymen lost, was a land of wonder for many English writers
and, for those who could make it over the Atlantic, a visit was a rite of
passage throughout the 19th century into the early 1900s.
At
best, most left with conflicting views of the republic and their own takes have
since been scrutinized as reflections of their own biases or a limited
understanding of a nation forming. Perhaps the most shocking came from Charles
Dickens after his 1842 trip which brought him from New York down the Eastern
seaboard and then as far as Illinois. His trip from January to June produced American
Notes for General Circulation (a likely jab at the US dollar), a travelogue
detailing his journey ad his thoughts, and a strange passage in the middle of
his Martin Chuzzlewit set in America.
Dickens
had long idealized the new world as stripped of the classism and control from
royalty. He ended the last issue of his literary journal Master Humphrey’s
Clock talking excitedly about his upcoming journey to the land of his
dreams.
To
be sure, Dickens found things to admire once in America. He fell in love with
Boston, deeming it an ideal the rest of the country should aspire to, and was
fascinated by the works being done at the Perkins Institution and Massachusetts
Asylum for the Blind.
It
is no hyperbole, however, to consider the rest of his visit a nightmare. On
certain issues he cannot be blamed. A nation he had long idolized as a land of
freedom had not yet undone the shackles of slavery. So horrified was Dickens at
the institution that he initially refused to speak south of the Mason-Dixie
line, changing his mind only after being won over by persuasive Southern charm.
On
other issues, however, Dickens demonstrates either a lack of understanding of
international laws or the biases of a Victorian gentleman against the
free-spirit of a developing nation as it was pushing westward.
Dickens’s
first real quarrel was with United States copyright laws, or lack thereof. In
the end, it was how well received his work and himself as a person had become
in the United States that repelled Dickens. His work had become so popular
across the pond from his homeland that, due to technicalities in international
copyright laws, unauthorized editions of his works were being circulated.
Enraged, Dickens went on a war bath throughout the cities he visited calling
for tighter copyright laws.
This
was only one aspect of fandom that dismayed Dickens. Though initially
flattered, he eventually became suffocated by the idolatry bestowed upon him by
the masses and the unrelenting attention. This was an early critique of the
culture of celebrity but it also, for Dickens, wandered into condemnations of
materialism and over consumption.
To
Dickens these problems were inescapable aspects of individualism which led to violence
and corruption, which became increasingly apparent to him as he charted toward
the as yet unsettled prairies and Mid-Western woodlands were the law was
limited and sanitation was unchecked.
There
was validity to a lot of what Dickens would observe but there was also an
obtuse understanding of a nation in growth, in which expansion (territorial and
technological) were part of the national pride and identity. In a sense, the
very thing that Dickens believed were America’s virtues were precisely what repelled
him.
Perhaps
it was a combination of two belligerencies, an author visiting without
separating idealization with reality and a nation still finding its way. Be
that as it may, on his second visit in 1868, with slavery abolished, copyright
laws changed and the areas west of the Mississippi significantly more
developed, Dickens left with a much higher appreciation for America.
Toward
the latter half of the 19th century more English writers both
visited and even lived in the United States for a brief period of time and the
responses were more nuanced. After leaving India, Rudyard Kipling settled for
some time in Vermont, an area he grew to love and in which he wrote some of his
most famous works. H.G. Wells also took up residence in the States and remained
neutral.
By
the first decade of the 20th century, America had changed and changed rapidly,
with population booms (due to the mass wave of immigration), urbanization
transformed the landscape and the connections within the landscape and it was
indeed becoming a nation of many tongues and high energy by the time Henry
James began writing The American Scene. James is an interesting case as
he was born in New York but had spent
the majority of his life in Europe before settling in England in 1898. The writings
that would become The American Scene when published in book form in 1907, were
written during his 10 month visit of his home country spanning 1904-5 after
living abroad for twenty-five years.
Obviously,
in that span of time James was destined to find a very different country than
he had left, New York City alone becoming a hodgepodge of cultures and
ethnicities. Due to the new ease of travel, James was able to visit a lot more
of the country than Dickens was, ending his trip once he made it across the
country to Los Angeles. The American Scene, however, covered only his
stay in the east. A planned second volume covering his wanderings to the Golden
Coast was never completed.
James’s
memories of his American boyhood may have been as much a hinderance to his
objectivity as Dickens’s idealization. Perhaps seeing so, his brother William,
who had now settled by New Hampshire’s White Mountains, warned his James
against the trip when he got word of it. Nonetheless, James was undeterred and
his brother’s home by Chocorua was to be the start of his trip.
The
American Scene
can be a slog to read, but it is an intriguing take sparking varied responses.
James himself seems conflicted and even in contradiction about how he found his
homeland, a sentiment undoubtedly changed by the life he created for himself
abroad.
He
waxed romantically about fall in New England and unexpectedly had a very
pleasant time in Baltimore but New York, as the epicenter of the changing
country, shocked him, as did parts of New England.
His
visit to Charleston opened his eyes to the “feminization” of the South after
the war and wondered what the legacy of the former Confederate States would be
as they tried to find themselves again. Identity became the core point of
contention in the Northeast as well. Two experiences recounted show the
impression the changing face of the eastern cities had on him, one involved
attending a theater production in which a group of foreigners joins him in the
audience in which he laments not only their manner of consuming candy but how cheaply
it is dispersed once in America when in their country it is surely a luxury.
The criticism here seems to be not so much about the foreign custom but about
the materialism and devaluing of goods that happen when the American mindset is
taken on.
On
the next instance, while looking for the famed House of the Seven Gables in
Salem, James asks an Italian national for directions to the landmark only to be
answered with confusion. At first James is put off by the ignorance but, not
unlike his encounter in the theater, he expresses it as an American rather than
Italian problem. Having visited Italy extensively, James reveled in its art and
passion for culture, concluding with the question, then, of what happens to Italians
(and other immigrants) when once in America.
James
perhaps was blinded by his own experiences in Europe, coming from an affluent
New York family and being able to traverse Europe before building a literary
life in England. There is also a distinction to be made between an established
artist visiting America and immigrants arriving here with little mastery of the
language to build a better life.
America
has remained a curious place for many artists. Not surprisingly, for a nation
of so many cultures, tongues, aspects opinions are seldom neutral and even less
seldom unconflicted. But its this very enigmatic nature of our land that keeps
it a point of fascination for brilliant minds.
Comments
Post a Comment