GLASGOW: A TALE OF TWO CITIES
Glasgow
I will need to revisit. I saw too little of it, but what I saw made me want to
get to know it more. I arrived too late in the day to appreciate the city’s
pulse and with little time to explore. What I did observe are its differences
from Edinburgh, its rival for the title of Scotland’s “true” city.
Glasgow
is the new city with a preference for the cosmopolitan. The Holiday Inn Glasgow
on West Nile St., where I stayed, was surrounded by departments stores, a movie
theater and the Glasgow Royal Concert Hall. The night of my arrival, I found a
hip Italian restaurant within walking distance from the hotel, ASK Italian and
the night before my departure visited a more rustic Italian diner, DiMaggio’s,
neighboring the hotel.
But to
the question, though, which city represents the real Scotland? I thread here
with hesitation as a visitor and one that saw far too little of Glasgow at
that. What I can say is that these questions come up often when the city of
national icons and heritage (Edinburgh) is pitted against the modern city with
universal amenities, entertainment centers and restaurants as well as more
residential options.
Fear of
being perceived as playing it safe makes me hesitant to admit that both kinds
of cities serve a purpose. In particular, a first time visitor should
prioritize Edinburgh if only to see the historic sites Scotland is known for.
But Glasgow will likely give you a deeper, purer sense of the Scottish people
living their everyday lives. Edinburgh is a must to experience Scotland’s roots
while Glasgow will show you her pulse.
In
this, my first visit, I got much of what I came to get. I experienced Scotland
in all her beauty, her customs and walked through her history. On my return I
hope to see more of the people that keep her alive.
Comments
Post a Comment